Roleplaying, lorabration, abliteration, smol models, extensive filtering, unusual datasets, home usage, HPCs for AI, distributed training/federated learning, and sentience.
AI should find and label AI hallucinations with GANs so we can give them context and use.
Have extra processing power in downtime? Have old devices you haven't used in years? I recommend primarily Folding@home to do protein folding on your GPUs, but also BOINC, particularly on Android and Apple devices, because of the lower power usage. I've been doing this, and get about 14,000 hours a week in, primarily for mapping cancer markers on BOINC on an Aiyara cluster of Androids. I also hold a sign out by the highway encouraging people to join BOINC. It was Dylan Bucci, a young promoter of BOINC on school's computers, who wished before he died to get as many people on as possible to do this, and in his honor, the Dylan Bucci challenge was implemented. No reason to wait for a challenge. If you care about such things, there is an associated cryptocurrency for such processing, but it's worth it to save lives.
I look forward to AI-related endeavors like this, and only know of NATIX Drive&, Acurast, and HYRA AI, all of which use Androids I'd rather devote to BOINC. However, they also allow one to be paid, and to totally devote old devices to the processing. On the same topic, DexPOINT monitizes your Android's Internet connection.
BOINC runs on Android, Apple, PCs of all sorts, Pi devices, Chrome devices, Fire Sticks, TV boxes, Android watches with the full OS, and all sorts of things that have Android or the ability to run Linux, although it will also run on Windows. Folding@home works best on PCs with modern NVIDIA GPUs, and in a cool room. You can also run BOINC on modern computers, but they must be throttled, because they often get too hot.
When you have good goals, along the lines of what will inevitably be implemented, the initial response is an uproar of "Why?!," followed by lazy attempts, and then, someone actually doing it right. Now, say you're the only driving force behind getting it right, and the rest want some other resource, like money. They will get the money, but not the influence, and the one with the influence, if pure in their goals, doesn't need the money, so ends up poor. I'm a ghostwriter. This is the ghostwriter's dilemma. I get things right often, but I can't touch the things. Shouldn't being right more often than the people that touch this stuff, alone, afford me access? Well, we're working on it.
